Categories

Archives

Like us on Facebook!

  • Follow us on Twitter

    Donate to AltNews.INFO

    Coin
    BTC
    Period
    Currency
    $
    • Buy $325.00
    • Sell $324.99
    • High $325.00
    • Low $308.70
    • Volume 6,807 BTC
    Period
    Currency
    $
    • Buy $326.00
    • Sell $326.34
    • High $326.41
    • Low $308.21
    • Volume 17,323 BTC
    Period
    Currency
    $
    • Buy $326.37
    • Sell $326.58
    • High NA
    • Low NA
    • Volume 51,774 BTC
    Period
    Currency
    $
    • Buy $328.25
    • Sell $328.33
    • High $328.32
    • Low $311.06
    • Volume 263 BTC

    NOTICE: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY All intellectual property rights to the various posts, materials, and cartoons belong solely to their respective creators. No claim is made here to the intellectual creations of others.

    Fukushima: Nuclear Apologists Play Shoot the Messenger on Radiation

    Dr. Helen Caldicott
    The Age
    May 1, 2011

    TWENTY-FIVE years after Chernobyl, many billions of dollars are at stake if the Fukushima reactor meltdowns cause the so-called “atomic renaissance” to halt or even slow down. This is evident from the nuclear industry’s vociferous attacks on its critics.

    We see this especially in Australia, where the industry is conducting a whatever-it-takes propaganda campaign to ensure that nothing stands in the way of vast profits to be made from continuing to export uranium; from the plan to establish a radioactive waste dump at Muckaty Station in the Northern Territory; and from the industry’s desire to dot the continent with reactors.

    Proponents of nuclear power – including George Monbiot, who has had a mysterious road-to-Damascus conversion to its supposedly benign effects – accuse me and others of ”cherry-picking” data and overstating the health effects of radiation. Yet by reassuring the public that things aren’t too bad, Monbiot and others misrepresent and distort the scientific evidence of the harmful effects of radiation exposure.

    Their first piece of disinformation is to confuse the effects of external and internal radiation. The former is what populations were exposed to when atomic bombs were detonated over Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945.

    Internal radiation, by contrast, emanates from radioactive elements that enter the body by inhalation, ingestion, or skin absorption. Hazardous radioactive elements being released in the sea and air around Fukushima accumulate at each step of various food chains (for example, into algae, crustaceans, small fish, bigger fish, then humans; or soil, grass, cow’s meat and milk, then humans). Entering the body, these elements – called internal emitters – migrate to specific organs such as the thyroid, liver, bone, and brain, continuously irradiating small volumes of cells with high doses of alpha, beta and/or gamma radiation, and over many years often induce cancer.

    Further, many remain radioactive in the environment for long periods, posing danger for future generations.

    The grave effects of internal emitters are of the most profound concern at Fukushima – as indeed they continue to be at Chernobyl. It is erroneous and misleading to use the term ”acceptable levels of external radiation” in assessing internal radiation doses. To do so is to propagate inaccuracies and to mislead the public worldwide and journalists who are seeking the truth about radiation’s hazards.

    Further, nuclear industry proponents assert that low doses of radiation produce no ill effects and are therefore safe. But, as a US National Academy of Sciences report concluded in 2007, no dose of radiation is safe, however small, including background radiation; exposure is cumulative, so that each dose (whether, for example, from a medical x-ray or from passing through the whole-body scanners soon to be introduced in Australian airports) adds to an individual’s risk of developing cancer during his or her lifetime.

    Regarding Chernobyl, various seemingly reputable groups have issued differing reports on the morbidity and mortalities resulting from the 1986 radiation catastrophe. The World Health Organisation in 2005 attributed only 43 human deaths directly to the disaster and estimated an additional 4000 fatal cancers. In contrast, a 2009 report published by the New York Academy of Sciences comes to a very different conclusion. Its scientist authors estimated the number of deaths attributable to the Chernobyl meltdown at about 980,000.

    Monbiot wrongly dismisses the report out of hand as worthless, but to ignore and denigrate an entire body of literature is arrogant and irresponsible.

    Finally, there is widespread confusion about the roles of the World Health Organisation and the International Atomic Energy Commission. Monbiot expresses surprise that a UN-affiliated body such as WHO might be under the influence of the nuclear power industry, causing its reporting on nuclear power matters to be biased. And yet that is precisely the case.

    In the early days of nuclear power, WHO issued forthright statements on radiation risks, such as its 1956 warning: ”Genetic heritage is the most precious property for human beings. It determines the lives of our progeny, health and harmonious development of future generations. As experts, we affirm that the health of future generations is threatened by increasing development of the atomic industry and sources of radiation.”

    After 1959, the organisation made no more statements on health and radioactivity.

    What happened?

    On May 28, 1959, at the 12th World Health Assembly, WHO drew up an agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency. A clause of this agreement says the WHO effectively grants the right of prior approval over any research it might undertake or report on to the IAEA – a group that many people, including journalists, think is a neutral watchdog, but which is, in fact, an advocate for the nuclear power industry. Its founding papers state: ”The agency shall seek to accelerate and enlarge the contribution of atomic energy to peace, health and prosperity through the world.”

    The WHO’s subjugation to the IAEA is widely known within the scientific radiation community, something which Monbiot chose to ignore. But it is clearly not the only matter on which he is ignorant, after his recent apparent three-day perusal of the vast body of scientific information on radiation and radioactivity. The confusion that he and other nuclear industry apologists sow about radiation risks is very similar to the way that the tobacco industry propounded misinformation and lies about the true effects of smoking.

    Despite their claims, it is they, not the ”anti-nuclear movement”, who are ”misleading the world about the impacts of radiation on human health”.

    Dr Helen Caldicott is the founding president of Physicians for Social Responsibility and the author of seven books, including Nuclear Power is Not the Answer.

    Read more:
    http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/society-and-culture/nuclear-apologists-play-shoot-the-messenger-on-radiation-20110425-1du2w.html#ixzz1L11iXRIE

     

    Radiation Detected In Drinking Water Across The U.S.

     

    Radiation warning symbol

    Jeff McMahon writes for Forbes:

    Radiation from Japan has been detected in drinking water in 13 more American cities, and cesium-137 has been found in American milk—in Montpelier, Vermont—for the first time since the Japan nuclear disaster began, according to data released by the Environmental Protection Agency late Friday.

    Milk samples from Phoenix and Los Angeles contained iodine-131 at levels roughly equal to the maximum contaminant level permitted by EPA, the data shows. The Phoenix sample contained 3.2 picoCuries per liter of iodine-131. The Los Angeles sample contained 2.9. The EPA maximum contaminant level is 3.0, but this is a conservative standard designed to minimize exposure over a lifetime, so EPA does not consider these levels to pose a health threat.

    The cesium-137 found in milk in Vermont is the first cesium detected in milk since the Fukushima-Daichi nuclear accident occurred last month. The sample contained 1.9 picoCuries per liter of cesium-137, which falls under the same 3.0 standard.

    Radioactive isotopes accumulate in milk after they spread through the atmosphere, fall to earth in rain or dust, and settle on vegetation, where they are ingested by grazing cattle. Iodine-131 is known to accumulate in the thyroid gland, where it can cause cancer and other thyroid diseases. Cesium-137 accumulates in the body’s soft tissues, where it increases risk of cancer, according to EPA.

    Airborne contamination continues to cross the western states, the new data shows, and Boise has seen the highest concentrations of radioactive isotopes in rain so far…

    For more information, see original article.

     

    California is radioactive. We’re now on our own.

    ALERT: Why are workers in full-body protection suits and face masks when monitoring radiation at a water facility near San Francisco? (VIDEOS)
    http://enenews.com/why-are-workers-wearing-full-body-protect…
    .
    San Jose Ca too.
    http://coupmedia.org/terror-threats/california-radiation-lev…
    .
    More breaking news here..
    http://coupmedia.org/terror-threats/radiation-dumped-into-pa…
    ####################################################
    Help me decipher this NEW INFO!!!!
    *WARNING…..Huge Cover up…California, Northwest, B.C. Canada under radiation as high as Japan. (Video)
    Video of Interview….Very Scary!
    http://vimeo.com/22003021
    .
    Full Links to HEADLINE STORY
    http://www.examiner.com/exopolitics-in-seattle/coverup-calif…
    .

    PLEASE PLEASE send this site to your friends!!!! READ AND READ!!!
    http://enenews.com/
    .
    I had my website designer over today, and he is a very talented person and he noticed the water in my garage and asked about it. I told him I will not drink the water here in Portland because it is contaminated. He told me to prove it……I showed him several sites and he had me step aside from my computer as he read and read and jumped to a bunch of other sites. He had calculators opened and was going crazy for a few minutes and he came to a conclusion….hes said..”I am not drinking this water”. Just now, after he left, he went home and put all of the facts together about what he has found. He put it into an easy to read format for all to understand because he feels this is THE MOST IMPORTANT NEWS EVER! Well….here it is…..take your time and understand the water in Portland Oregon.
    He put the results on his FACEBOOK page here..
    http://www.facebook.com/notes/rion-massie/drinking-water-is-…
    .
    I also asked him to place it on another site if people didn’t want to go to facebook…here..
    http://www.hiddenenemies.com/
    .
    DIGG IT
    http://digg.com/news/science/drinking_water_in_portland_or_i…
    .
    7,500,000 Times limit….Are you kidding me??
    http://enenews.com/radioactive-iodine-at-7-5-million-times-l…
    .
    Latest forecast has all of California under radiation threat April 6, 7 — Shows levels as high as in Japan (VIDEO)
    .
    http://enenews.com/latest-forecast-shows-all-california-radi…
    .
    .
    EPA: Boise rainwater has highest levels of radioactive material in US… 80 times amount of I-131 allowed in drinking water — “Officials had no explanation”.
    http://enenews.com/epa-boise-rainwater-has-highest-levels-of…
    .
    Why is this not being reported???
    .
    UPDATE: NY Times contributor confirms California rainwater 181 times above drinking water standards for radioactive iodine-131
    .
    UPDATE II: Nuclear policy expert: “Striking” that radioactive iodine-131 in California rainwater is so far above level permitted in drinking water
    .
    This link takes you to all of the stories…
    http://enenews.com/radioactive-iodine-131-in-rainwater-sampl…
    .
    Another good link..
    http://enenews.com/ny-times-contributor-confirms-california-…
    .
    Here is your “Particle Forecast for April 6th”.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wJninXiYIM&feature=player_em…
    .
    UPDATE….
    YOU HAVE TO SEE THESE Hi Res Photos. Amazing….and Horrifying!
    http://cryptome.org/eyeball/daiichi-npp/daiichi-photos.htm
    download the Files if needed. The photos on this site are only 1/2 size. If you download the files you can see in Full view. Insane destruction.
    .
    Nuclear industry propaganda about low-level radiation is “absolute rubbish” says physician who taught at Harvard Med School — It’s all about internal emitters (VIDEO)
    .
    http://enenews.com/nuclear-industry-propaganda-about-low-lev…
    .
    UPDATE 2
    (Greenpeace) Radiation counter maxed out at 9999+… 35/40 km from Fukushima, well beyond evacuation zone (VIDEO)
    No evacuation?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3eBMiJKit0